Contemporaneous, multi-physician, online consultation system

Abstract

The computer-implemented system of providing online medical consultation services in which professionals associated with the system formulate structured survey questions for medical professionals selected from a database, based upon information provided to the system by the user through an Internet capable communications device. The survey is provided to the medical professionals electronically and responses are provided to the system electronically. Responses may be quantitative and quantitative in nature and are compiled by the system, and a consensus is obtained and displayed in real time on the system website, to which the user has access through the Internet capable communications device. The system may be used to provide “nested” surveys in which the medical professionals have the option of responding to the initial survey by defining recipients for a further survey, which may be the same or different than the initial survey.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS[0001]This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11 / 504,467, filed Aug. 15, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,423,383, issued Apr. 16, 2013.STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT[0002]Not ApplicableREFERENCE TO A “SEQUENCE LISTING”, A TABLE, OR A COMPUTER[0003]PROGRAM LISTING APPENDIX SUBMITTED ON COMPACT DISC[0004]Not ApplicableBACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0005]1. Field of the Invention[0006]The present invention relates to a medical consultation system and more particularly to a contemporaneous, multi-physician, online consultation system in which a user can obtain easily understandable medical opinions of many qualified, unbiased health care professionals and experts through the Internet. This system can provide information as to the sum of the opinions of medical professions for a variety of case scenarios and establish whether, and to what extent, a consensus of such opinions exists.[0007...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

The present invention is a computer-implemented system that provides online medical consultation services to users. The system allows users to connect to a website and select the level of consultation services they need. The system verifies the user's payment information and sends a message to the user to log into the website. The user submits information about their case and the system selects a team of medical professionals to review and provide their opinion on the case. The system generates a graphical representation of the opinions and sends a message to the user. The system also allows users to opt out of participation in the consultation and makes note of their decision. The technical effects of the invention include providing a convenient and efficient way for users to access medical consultation services and allowing medical professionals to review and provide their opinion on cases in real-time.

Problems solved by technology

In the information age, effective decision making can be easily impaired by an overabundance of data.

Ironically, these instantly available facts and opinions can paralyze rather than enhance decision making because capabilities to obtain information often overwhelm systems to meaningfully characterize and analyze the information received.

This dilemma is particularly true in health care fields where multiple sources of medical facts and opinions, often varying in strength and verifiability, inform medical decision making.

This vast volume of medical data often presented in an unfamiliar format can lead to patient confusion.

This confusion is further complicated by competing claims often arising from the dissemination of medical information by parties with proprietary interests in health care products or services.

Because of the vastness of medical information, health care practitioners may weigh medical information differently resulting in the rendering of patient medical opinions which may, in some cases, conflict with one another.

If medical professionals can offer different medical advice for the same case scenario, it is not surprising that medically untrained patients can be easily confused and frustrated by the amount and variability of available medical information.

Though the work of these groups is quite valuable, inevitably it is slow, often non-specific and cannot address the nuances of medical care relevant to individual patients.

Because of these limitations, an individual patient who seeks to obtain a consensus medical opinion on his or her specific health care circumstances can not be sure if this goal is met.

Unfortunately, except for the exceptionally educated patient perhaps, finding a consensus of opinion would be more guesswork than science.

Images