Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

Variable tangential flow filtration

a tangential flow and filtration technology, applied in the field of immunoglobulins, can solve the problems of sustained damage even affecting drug products, complicated downstream processing of immunoglobulins,

Active Publication Date: 2013-11-12
F HOFFMANN LA ROCHE & CO AG
View PDF11 Cites 2 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0024]The current invention reports a method for concentrating immunoglobulin solutions to a concentration of more than 100 mg / ml. It has been surprisingly found that with a method according to the invention this can be achieved with low aggregate formation and in short time.
[0040]It has now surprisingly been found that with a tangential flow filtration (TFF) method according to the current invention in which the transmembrane pressure and cross-flow are variable during the filtration process and are adapted depending on the actual concentration of the immunoglobulin in the solution to be concentrated a concentrated immunoglobulin solution with low aggregate formation can be obtained in a short time. That is, it has surprisingly been found that aggregate formation during tangential flow filtration is low if a TFF method according to the invention is applied, i.e. a method in which during the filtration process the transmembrane pressure is changed and adapted according to the actual concentration of the antibody solution. The method according to the invention is a variable method compared to constant methods as known from the art, i.e. to methods in which the transmembrane pressure is adopted prior to the filtration process and is held constant during the entire tangential flow filtration process.
[0048]By observing flux versus ascending protein concentration there is no significant difference in the curves for processes at different Δp. But for the 3 bar mode a lower end concentration due to a high inlet pressure was observed. Compared to a concentration mode performed under a lower constant cross-flow (CF; 90 ml / min.) and a lower mean Δp (about 0.9 bar) a higher Δp of 1.2-1.8 bar contributes to an improved flux performance over time and a higher end concentration (TMP always 0.6 bar).
[0050]A TFF method has been developed with comparable overall process time compared to the stressing high inlet pressure mode (Δp=3 bar), based on TMP / CF-scouting experiments (see e.g. Luo, R., et al., Bioprocess Int. 4 (2006) 44-54). The method according to the invention has been developed to improve flux performance over time with reduced immunoglobulin aggregate formation, i.e. to combine a low aggregate formation and a short overall concentration time. During the developing of the method according to the invention a TMP and CF scouting was performed depending on the prevailing immunoglobulin concentration in the immunoglobulin solution to be concentrated. An method with adapted TMP and CF depending on the best flux profile at a given concentration was found. Without the disadvantage of high inlet pressure at the final stage of the concentration (see e.g. Dosmar, M., et al., Bioprocess Int. 3 (2005) 40-50) the method according to the invention showed a low aggregation burden in turbidity, LO, and DLS data for produced concentrates (see FIGS. 3 and 4). In addition a higher end concentration was achieved with the method according to the invention.
[0051]In the method according to the invention the transmembrane pressure and cross-flow are varied with respect to the actual concentration of the concentrated immunoglobulin solution. In one embodiment the method according to the invention is a variable tangential flow filtration method wherein the actual concentration of the immunoglobulin in the solution to be concentrated determines the applied transmembrane pressure and cross-flow. Thus, the transmembrane pressure and cross-flow are adjusted depending on the actual concentration of the immunoglobulin in order to reduce the stress applied and, thus, to reduce the formation of aggregated immunoglobulin molecules and to provide a short overall concentration time.

Problems solved by technology

Due to their chemical and physical properties, such as molecular weight and domain architecture including secondary modifications, the downstream processing of immunoglobulins is very complicated.
Furthermore short concentration times are favored to ensure smooth processes and short operating times. In this context imperfect TFF processes especially after final purification steps can cause sustained damage even affecting drug product.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

Analytical Methods

a) Turbidity Measurement.

[0085]The photometric absorbance was determined at 350 nm and 550 nm, where no intrinsic chromophores in the antibody solution absorb (UV-VIS spectrophotometer Evolution 500, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA). The samples were measured undiluted. As a reference medium the appropriate buffer solution was used. Every measurement was conducted three times.

b) Size-Exclusion-HPLC.

[0086]The chromatography was conducted with a Tosoh Haas TSK 3000 SWXL column on an ASI-100 HPLC system (Dionex, Idstein, Germany). The elution peaks were monitored at 280 nm by a UV diode array detector (Dionex). After dissolution of the concentrated samples to 1 mg / ml the column was washed with a buffer consisting of 200 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate and 250 mM potassium chloride pH 7.0 until a stable baseline was achieved. The analyzing runs were performed under isocratic conditions using a flow rate of 0.5 ml / min. over 30 minutes at room temperature. The c...

example 2

Determination of TMP and CF Conditions

[0090]A conditioned and filtered citrate-buffered aqueous solution (pH 5.5) of an anti-IL-IR antibody was concentrated twenty fold up to 100 mg / ml by use of an automated TFF system ÄKTAcrossflow™ (GE Healthcare, Amersham Bioscience AB, Uppsala, Sweden) by employing a scaleable flat sheet cassette (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany) with a Hydrosart™ membrane of regenerated cellulose, with a nominal molecular weight cut-off of 30 kDa and a membrane area of 0.02 m2. Different concentration programs generated with the UNICORN software controlling ÄKTAcrossflow™ were performed. Total membrane loading was about 400 g / m2.

[0091]Flux and pressure profiles at four preset transmembrane pressures are determined at different immunoglobulin concentrations in the immunoglobulin solution to be concentrated with respect to different cross-flows. The TMP was set to 0.3 bar, 0.5 bar, 0.9 bar, or 2.0 bar. The cross-flows for each TMP and protein concentration were 50 ...

example 3

Comparison of the Variable Method According to the Invention to Constant Methods

[0098]The method according to the invention was compared to different constant parameter methods for the production of a concentrated immunoglobulin solution. The target concentration was set to 90 mg / ml. The tangential flow filtration was performed with the devices according to Example 2. The different parameters of the compared methods (methods 1 to 4 are constant methods, method 5 is the variable method according to the invention) were the following:

Method 1: transmembrane pressure=0.6 bar

[0099]cross-flow=90 ml / min[0100]Δp=0.7 bar

Method 2: transmembrane pressure=0.6 bar[0101]Δp=1.2 bar

Method 3: transmembrane pressure=0.6 bar[0102]Δp=1.8 bar

Method 4: transmembrane pressure=0.6 bar[0103]Δp=3.0 bar

Method 5: a) transmembrane pressure=1.5 bar, Δp=0.5 bar,[0104]b) transmembrane pressure=0.85 bar, Δp=1.2 bar,[0105]c) transmembrane pressure=0.85 bar.

[0106]The different parameters and the time required to achi...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
transmembrane pressureaaaaaaaaaa
concentrationaaaaaaaaaa
concentrationaaaaaaaaaa
Login to View More

Abstract

The current invention reports a method for concentrating an immunoglobulin solution by tangential flow filtration wherein the transmembrane pressure and the cross-flow are variable.

Description

[0001]The current invention is in the field of protein concentration, to be more precise it relates to the use of tangential flow filtration (TFF) for immunoglobulin concentration.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0002]Proteins and especially immunoglobulins play an important role in today's medical portfolio. Expression systems for the production of recombinant polypeptides are well-known in the state of the art and are described by, e.g., Marino, M. H., Biopharm. 2 (1989) 18-33; Goeddel, D. V., et al., Methods Enzymol. 185 (1990) 3-7; Wurm, F., and Bernard, A., Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 10 (1999) 156-159. Polypeptides for use in pharmaceutical applications are mainly produced in mammalian cells such as CHO cells, NSO cells, Sp2 / 0 cells, COS cells, HEK cells, BHK cells, PER.C6® cells, and the like.[0003]For human application every pharmaceutical substance has to meet distinct criteria. To ensure the safety of biopharmaceutical agents to humans, for example, nucleic acids, viruses, and host...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
Patent Type & Authority Patents(United States)
IPC IPC(8): A23J1/00C07K1/00C07K14/00C07K16/00
Inventor HEPBILDIKLER, STEFANKUHNE, WOLFGANGROSENBERG, EVAWINTER, GERHARD
Owner F HOFFMANN LA ROCHE & CO AG
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products