Antiriot weapon system combat effectiveness evaluation method based on radar map method

Abstract

The invention discloses an antiriot weapon system combat effectiveness evaluation method based on a radar map method. The method comprises the following steps: S1, establishing an antiriot weapon system combat effectiveness evaluation index system; S2, normalizing the combat effectiveness evaluation indexes of the antiriot weapon system; S3, drawing an antiriot weapon system radar map according tothe normalized combat effectiveness indexes; and S4, establishing a comprehensive evaluation model for the combat effectiveness of the antiriot weapon system. The invention discloses a multivariablegraphical evaluation method developed and applied based on similar navigation radars. According to the method, the defects that an existing method is high in mathematical requirement, complex in calculation process and not visual enough in evaluation result are well overcome, the quantitative relation between all indexes in evaluation is expressed in a graphic mode, the method is visual and vivid,the evaluation process is simple, and comprehensive evaluation is achieved. The method can also be used for evaluating the combat effectiveness of other non-lethal weapons, and the evaluation problemin weapon system combat effectiveness evaluation is solved.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention belongs to the technical field of combat effectiveness evaluation of weapon systems, and in particular relates to a method for evaluating combat effectiveness of anti-riot weapon systems based on a radar graph method. Background technique [0002] In the complex international environment and intense regional conflicts, terrorism is the main problem facing the international community. Non-lethal weapons are the most effective weapons for international police and forces to deal with terrorism, which also promotes the development of non-lethal weapons technology. At present, the evaluation methods of non-lethal weapons mainly include: the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and the combination of power index and analytic hierarchy process. There are two main defects in the above methods: 1) The evaluation results contain subjective factors; 2) The evaluation results cannot directly reflect the relative advantages and disadvantages of each...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

There are two main defects in the above-mentioned methods: 1) the evaluation results contain subjective factors; 2) the evaluation results cannot directly reflect the relative advantages and disadvantages of each single index of system combat effectiveness

Images